EU aims at improving fireworks safety

jonmif

Registered User
EU aims at improving fireworks safety
by di-ve news


BRUSSELS, Malta (di-ve news) -- October 15, 2005 --1300CEST --The European Commission has proposed to replace some 25 parallel national approval procedures of fireworks and airbags by one single EU directive. The EU feels that better regulation will lead to a considerable reduction in costs for the industries concerned and ensure that essential safety requirements for pyrotechnic articles are respected throughout the whole Union.

The EU is aiming at reducing the risk of accidents caused by malfunctions and to increase consumer safety as sub-standard pyrotechnic articles will no longer be available on the EU market.

In Malta, the usually festive summer period was marred by the death of no less than five men in the space of four months, all after being injured in fireworks related accidents, raising questions about the safety of Malta's fireworks factories and the whole industry. Presently, in Malta there are around 40 fireworks factories, the majority of which belong to band clubs while some are privately owned. In some villages there are up to two factories belonging to rival band clubs.

In the case of Malta, material used in the manufacture of pyrotechnics is imported by specialised importers and manufacturers but potassium chlorate and potassium nitrate are stored in a central place under the supervision of the Armed Forces of Malta. The material is then distributed according to a pre-set quota to each fireworks factory. Each factory can take up to a 400kg a month of these two substances.

By now, the licences procedure is according to national regulations and the EU does not get into this. The Government of Malta issues Category A licences for persons qualified to manufacture and supervise the manufacture of fireworks, Category B licences for assistants to persons holding licence A, and Category C licences for persons authorised to let off fireworks under the supervision of a person in possession of a Category A licence.

Safety regulations in Malta stipulate that fireworks factories must consist of a cluster of small individual buildings separated from each other, that no unlicensed persons shall enter the factories, that passers-by shall be warned of a fireworks factory in the vicinity and that the minimum rules and distances are observed.

After the 1976 Seveso accident, the EU had come up with the Seveso directive introducing requirements for safety management systems, emergency plans, land-use planning and a reinforcement of inspections to be carried out by Member States. The directive however is only applicable for factories storing over 50 tonnes of fireworks and as a result, the law does not apply to fireworks factories in Malta.

However, following a major fireworks accident in the Netherlands in May 2000, the EU proposed various changes to the directive including a threshold of 5 tonnes down from the previous 50 tonnes (Seveso II Directive).

The EU market for fireworks is estimated at around 1.4 billion Euros, but few fireworks are manufactured in the EU.

The new Commission proposal now includes safety requirements related to physical and chemical stability; the compatibility of all components; resistance to normal, foreseeable handling and transportation; resistance against water and low and high temperatures; safety features to prevent untimely or inadvertent initiation or ignition; suitable instructions in the official language or languages of the recipient Member State; and ability to withstand deterioration.

Manufacturers will be obliged to comply with these requirements, which in return give them the right to affix the CE marking and access to the internal market.
At the same time, taking into account the variety of different national regulations on the marketing and use of fireworks, the proposal leaves the possibility for Member States to maintain their own regulations as far as the minimum age and the marketing and use of certain categories of fireworks are concerned.

The EU said that the intention of the proposal is to deal with product characteristics, not with questions arising from the storage and manufacture of pyrotechnic articles. That aspect is already being dealt with in the framework of Council Directive 96/82/EC (Seveso II Directive) aimed at the prevention of major accident hazards involving dangerous substances and at the limitation of the consequences of such accidents for people and the environment.
 

Luqa - Malta

Registered User
That is a good thing but unfortunately by the time the new laws and regulations are made official, more people will still get into accidents. And also the EU laws hardly touch the Maltese fireworks because it aims at large comercial factories! Not traditional cultural factories like the Maltese ones.

What needs to be done must come from the Maltese Authorities and we cant wait for next year. This year has been the worst year of accidents that I can remember!

*4 from Zebbug Died, others injured in a massive factory explosion
*1 from Balzan Died. Rumors saywhen the Berqa mix exploded.
*1 from Qrendi Injured, Rumors say when the berqa mix exploded.
*1 from Qormi died when the star press machine fell on him.
*1 injured in Luqa show when a multi break shell did not fully burst in the air and thus burst on the ground on another shell. (he is ok now thank God).
*Factory in Gozo explodes but no one was there so no one was injured, rumors say it might have been a mouse but i doubt it. This is very strange because there was no happenings at the factory at that time. It
could have been a crime but you can never tell....

In Malta there is no official government laboratory which can test the chemichals that are imported. This is a crutial factor since exporters from abroad can abuse of this and export to Malta cheep stuff with a big price tag and Importers in Malta could also benefit or it simply could be that bad stuff is unintentialy imported to Malta. I am not accusing anyone but just listing the possibilities.

And to add al this: See the article writen by Joe Falzon which was mentioned earlier on this forum. That is a very good writen article. Many good pyros many enthusiasts alike in Malta share the same views with him. Ialways had the same views as him and many people I talk to say the same things.

Laws are not to be unbareable but they must be inforced! This would not inconviene the pyros but it would protect them and protect their beautifull trade!

If they all work togethor, things will only get better. I dont know anything about the Maltese Pyrotechnics Association other than it simply exists. Found no websites of it. Dont know who the members are. Hardly hear anything about it. But it might be very usefull this association if it works with the government and makes pressure on the government for aid to make this Art better in Malta. After all we do consider our pyros as somewhat on a different level then others around the world. Not necessarly better, but different in Level. I mean there is a specific character to the Maltese shells.

Thanks and Regards
 

Vavoom

Registered User
One of the things that the EU might focus on is the ingredients that the Maltese flash powders are made of.

Another is the production technique. Punching a hole in those small crackers (beraqs I believe) when they are already filled with a mixture that is sensitive to shock and friction is not a thing I would like to do.
 

Luqa - Malta

Registered User
There are already national regulations on flash powders and recently have been updated. The problem is not what type of powder to use. The problem in my opinion is the quality of poweders imported if its up to standards. No one knows since there is no official laboratory. Some exporters may sacrifice quality for more profit!

I import Sports products to Malta from various localities allover the world. When you import the first time, exporters send you the best quality they have for a specific price, the second time as well but then after that some of them sacrifice good material for more profit and send you cheeper stuff for the same price as before. This is just the way it is. (Thank God i dont import explosive materials). I change exporters when ever I need to, since some of the items I import are safety wear and you just cant risk it! So there must be strict testing of these powders.

Regarding techniques, NOT even the EU can monitor what goes on in a factory. Its the Licencee's (leader) and every pyro in the factory responasbility to work safely. Police and officials go down to factories once in a while but you cant have them sitting there all day to make sure no dangerous technique is performed.

If something illegal happens in a factory and it blows up.... many times there is no way to tell what happened. Why? because the only proof there usually are left are flames and rubbels.

I still find the news paper article by Joe Falzon to be spot on! I totaly share the same views as him. The guy should be employed as a National Fireworks Safety Advisor ;) Having said this, many reputable pyros in Malta share his same views and some work hard to achive top safety.

The problem with laws is that most of them are made by diplomats and the problem by diplomats is that they are highly inteligent arm chair people but totaly not practical people. I mean they can calculate 789vsxrX200 v = 77opq.....(10 minutes later)....456pyr2 % 21 90squared = (answear), but yet they cant change a light bulb! |:(

What I mean is that the persons directly involved in the subject should be consulted and keep a High vote on evey single law and regulation to be put forward.

Thats all I have to say about this. Other than that, Read the article by Joe Falzon. (when I read that, I felt that I almost wrote it myself!).
 
Bovenaan